Skip to main content

(Finalized) Reader Response Draft #4 : "4 Ways to Demolish a Building"

Finalized Reader Response:

In the article “4 Ways to Demolish a Building”, Rodriguez (2018) states the methods of building demolition. The author also mentions that several factors are taken into consideration when planning a building demolition: the area, the building’s materials, and the purpose of the demolition.

Implosion involves the use of explosives, which is placed at identified areas through analysis of the building’s blueprints. The author states the high reach arm method is an alternative and is typically used for buildings exceeding 66 feet. It involves a base machine “fitted with a long demolition arm” that is attached to a crusher tool to break the building from the top. It is safer than the wrecking ball method, which is a traditional and common practice of building demolition. The ball is suspended from a crane and then swung into the building. However, this method produces a high amount of noise, dust, and vibration. The final method mentioned in the article is selective demolition, which is the selective removing of the building’s materials. It allows builders to reuse and recycle them, and its environmentally friendly approach has increased its popularity over the years. 

The author mentions the primary considerations when planning on how to demolish a building. However, he fails to mention other key factors when planning a building demolition: safety concerns, risk assessment and the permit requirements.

Firstly, the author should have mentioned the safety concerns and its importance in a building demolition plan. In the environment of a building demolition work, there is a probability of being exposed to danger, risk, injury, and even death. In the article “Miami Beach building collapse was an accident” (2018), it was mentioned that the “building collapsed July 21 in an unsafe manner” and “something happened during the controlled demolition that sent the entire building crashing down at once”. This accident resulted in a project manager being injured and passing away the week after. Despite the man being outside of the building’s premises, he was hit by a projectile from the debris of the building’s collapse. In this case, it is clear that there were insufficient safety precautions taken in this building demolition plan. 

Secondly, the author should have stated that risk assessment is essential when planning a building demolition. Risk assessment is the evaluation of all possible risks that can happen in an activity. Dalton (2018) mentions the method used in this building demolition incident was the implosion method, which is more prone to risks. The author also mentioned that “When you look at what has been done in preparation, it should fall the other way. It’s really unfortunate that it went wrong that way”. Through this statement, it is clear that the involved parties of the building demolition did not assess all possible risks despite undergoing planning for six months.  If they had prepared a thorough risk assessment and had taken into consideration how things could have gone wrong, they would have been able to prevent the accident.

Lastly, the author had failed to mention the importance of obtaining the relevant permits required in a building demolition plan. Woo (2016) mentioned that the University of Washington commenced demolition works without a demolition permit. The university had already handed in a demolition application, but they did not wait for approval and began demolition works. This resulted in complaints and a “stop work order and notice of violation” was issued by inspectors. Even though the demolition did not post any threats, it was temporarily halted as it was not officially approved. This shows that it is important to obtain the required permits so as to prevent such unnecessary delays from occurring. This point can be further supported in the website “Structural Plan Approval And Permit To Commence Structural Works” (2018), which mentions that an approved permit is required for demolition works.

In conclusion, the author talked about the four building demolition methods in a straightforward and clear tone that is easy to understand, with relevant details and references. However, other key factors when planning a building demolition could have been mentioned. Additionally, the mentioned primary considerations in the article could have been further elaborated in order to make the article more informative.


Revised: 11th Oct 2018
References
Building and Construction Authority. (2018). Structural Plan Approval And Permit To Commence Structural Works. Retrieved from https://www.bca.gov.sg/StructuralPlan/structural_plan_application.html

CNN Wire. (2018). A Miami Beach building collapse was an accident, contractor says. Retrieved from https://wtkr.com/2018/07/23/miami-beach-building-collapse-was-an-accident-contractor-says/ 

Dalton. J. (2018). Demolition accident as silo tower falls wrong way and crushes cultural centre. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/denmark-silo-tower-video-demolition- vordingborg-collapse-wrong-way-library-a8295651.html

Rodriguez. J. (2018). 4 Ways to Demolish a Building. Retrieved from https://www.thebalancesmb.com/ways-to-demolish-buildings-844420


Woo. E. (2016). UW begins construction without permit. Retrieved from http://www.savethereactor.org/news/2016/7/8/uw-begins-deconstruction-without-permit

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A New Chapter

Dear Prof, My name is Jorine Ng, and the purpose of this letter is to introduce myself. I am a Year 1 student attending your effective communication module. I graduated from Temasek Polytechnic with a diploma in facility management, along with a certificate in psychology. For the longest time, I wanted to work in the built environment industry.  I believed that saving energy was not always about peoples' efforts, but how the building is built as well.  I eventually decided to further my studies in the Sustainable Infrastructure Engineering (building services) program in SIT.  Aside from academic interests, I am interested in learning languages. I feel language is not only a way to communicate, but also a unique form of art. I have studied Japanese, and I am currently studying Korean. I also plan to pick up American Sign Language one day. With regards to my communication skills, I would say that I am confident in my ability to speak to people. I have no qualms starting a conve
9 comments
Read more

Critical Reflection

Module learning:  After 14 weeks of EFFCOM lessons, the module has come to an end. Looking back at the goals I’ve set out at the start of the module, I was able to improve my writing skills through our assignments, especially the technical report team assignment which allowed me to learn from my teammates as well. The module also covers effective communication and presentation skills through the project and assignments which are crucial skills in a workplace. I’ve also improved on my communication skills as well as broaden my horizons on current engineering issues.  In a way, taking this module has reminded me that there is always something new you can learn. It has contributed to my learning by equipping me with critical communication skills to be on a competitive level in the industry. I definitely became a better communicator which can be seen during my presentation. Despite not presenting in front of a crowd for months, I was not as nervous as I expected to be. I hope to be able to
2 comments
Read more

Presentation Showcase Reflection

The module has come to an end with the presentation showcase. Despite my team not presenting at the showcase, it has been a wonderful day watching other groups present their ideas. Watching the other teams helped me to broaden my perspective on current issues in the industry as well as how effective non-verbal actions such as simple hand gestures can be when delivering a presentation. In regards to the presenting teams’ uses of audio-visuals, I had noticed that all presenting groups use slides that are simple yet informative slides to deliver their message to the audience. In my personal opinion, Team PES Green from my class has done a good job in delivering their message in their presentation. Even though I had seen them present before, they had done a lot of improvements in their presentation today. The team had neat yet informative slides that they used to be able to explain their points effectively. The members spoke with confidence and were informative about their own solution. T
1 comment
Read more